Okay, so this may be slightly offensive to certain faggots out there so ctrl+f4 if you must :)

Well, since EVERYONEs talking about it, well lets just say I'm a tad bit too busybody to be left out.

Unlike previous years, this year I'm almost completely lost if you start me on American Idol. I didn't even know it had started when the news of the finalist came out. Kris sumfin, god knows who he is... but he's not the hot topic of the year... no he isn't. The spotlight is still given out to famous gay contestant Adam Lambert. WOOt.

So like, I've only seen Adam Lambert perform for 5 seconds, and that was when I managed to flip through american idol when I was actually at home. I can't say I heard much, seeing that he was probably on the last note of his song... But he was, considerably better than most other contestants. That's a big thing seeing I've only heard him sing 1 note. Literally, babys. And obviously, everyone knew he was gay. Hey, even I heard he was gay long before I knew who adam lambert was. And I'm serious! (I thought he was a politician >_>)

So surprise surprise, the best singer in the contest came out second in place to someone most people probably hate right now.

Boo. *shun**shun* WE WANT LAMBERT. WE WANT LAMBERT.....

Okay, so hopefully you get the sarcasm. Or else... poor you.

Is it really inconcievable that Lambert lost? I knew he was going to lose, even though I know he was the most popular singer. I have this instinct, which i love to call logical deduction, to predict who will come up first in a fair fight of skills... (even though one is obviously much more skilled than the other) So don't be bothered when you see poor ol me walking right when everyone is going left.

You know I'm always correct ;)

Well, sometimes always.

But the point is. Adam Lambert didn't win because he is GAAAY. Can it be anymore obvious? I mean GEEZ people, you don't have to go around telling others "Oh hey, have you heard Adam lost? I think it's because he's GAAAAY. He should have won!". And then spend the next gazillion years moping over his loss. So what if he lost because he's GAY and noone will vote for him? He should have thought of that before joining the damned contest, now should he? America is not going to vote for a gay. The ratio of homophobes to those who don't think enough to bother are immensly apart. They might be able to vote for a black prezzie; but obviously racism is not as strong as sexism. (and because everyone knows the McCain-Palin duo are comparable to our Najib and urr.... godknowswho of Malaysian politics :D)

Well, one thing that makes the difference between acceptance of different races and sexes more so that accepting people of different sexuality. Which is, by far, for me, the most important reason of all, even though it has been repeated and denied SO many countless of times before -- is that GAY PEOPLE CAN CHANGE. If you're black, you are born that way! Can you change your skin colour? Even with pigmentation surgery nowadays, it's quite impossible to change your skin tone genuinely. Same goes to gender. But sexual orientation is a completely different story. A man or woman, healthily born into the world, decides to go cuckoo and screw someone who they're not supposed to.

It's an outright form of rebellion against society. I would start quoting some Sociology notes but I have a Sociology journal to do by this weekend, and i would like to save my shizzles for those.

Rebelling is by choice, and yes I know most of these people claim to be "born that way" or "is not able to change the way they are" but really, it's bullshit. Well, "Not that I know anyway, I'm not you". But really, scientist have tried over the years, decades, centuries, milleniums to find an answer or an abnormality in the human body which clearly, directly tell you - hey! You're gay because apparently you're born with an abnormality called the Gay Center. So it's not your fault! Hypothesis phail.

But you see, gay activists ( when I say gay, i refer to both genders) tend to start screaming for gay rights. Well, thats the reason people become activists in the first place! Well, IMO, their efforts are as futile as Goth Activists rallying for Goth Rights. (Cause goth's are meant to be treated the same as the rest of the community! Isn't that why Goth's become Goth's in the first place? To become normal?)

Oh yeah, you might say HEY. Feminists call for Women's Rights too, so why can't we?! Well, other than what I've stated that it's slightly more acceptable than you homos because women were born as women. But hey, as far as I know, they're fighting because they are born into a society where they are inept. Not because they choose to be.

Well, with science nowadays, they can opt to grow penises instead. But then that'll just make "Gay" a little more too complicated.

Okay, so maybe I've ranted a little too much than I'm supposed to. Thanks to Chris Crocker and his latest youtube video, I'm finally have muse to post in here. If my lecturers give interesting topics like this, i might actually do better in class. I'd better start my paper on Religeon and Society anyway. (not like I care much about either)

Labels: early morning madness, homosexuals, museless, rant, SOCS 102